RACHEL MITCHELL’S REPORT ON THE FAKE FORD TESTIMONY..

The nation watched and learned, as a 100% fabricated event, orchestrated by the vile and amoral Democrats, unfolded to destroy Judge Kavanaugh, his family and his reputation. Rachel Mitchell, Nominations Investigative Counsel, questioned Mrs. Ford. The report is very telling, and should alert every American to the DemocRats, (aka Liberals/Progressives/Socialists) will go to any length to get and […]

Read more of this post

Comment    See all comments
Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from C Hamilton Boone’s “All Freedoms” Blog.
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.hamboone.com/2018/10/01/rachel-mitchells-report-on-the-fake-ford-testimony/

WHO IS FAKE FORD..THE FACTS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE..

As with most people who follow politics, I am watching the purposeful destruction of an honorable man’s reputation and career..to say nothing of what this circus is dong to his family.

Just think of that..the single focused effort by evil and corrupt people to manufacture an event and destroy a citizen..all because they want to win! Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?

We have seen this playbook time and again with the DemoRats, it’s destroy at all costs; damn the facts!

Using innuendo, misrepresentation..aka LIES, they show no conscience..but do show their soulless and immoral actions in the full view of all. More each day are learning who and what the DemocRats(Socialist) exactly are, and the level they are willing to stoop.

This article in the Washington Times, lays bare 8 reasons Fake Ford and the DemocRat’s story smells..

Eight big problems for Christine Blasey Ford’s story

Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations against Brett Kavanaugh are serious. She is accusing him of violent attempted rape. “I thought he might inadvertently kill me. He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing,” she told The Washington Post, recounting the alleged incident at a high school party “one summer in the early 1980s.”

But her story is also growing less believable by the day. Here are eight reasons why it’s hardly “anti-woman” for senators to question her account at Thursday’s hearing:

1) For starters, Ford still can’t recall basic details of what she says was the most traumatic event in her life. Not where the “assault” took place — she’s not sure whose house it was, or even what street it was on. Nor when — she’s not even sure of the year, let alone the day and month.

Ford’s not certain how old she was or what grade she was in when she says an older student violently molested her. (But she doesn’t plead inebriation: She described having just “one beer” at the party.)

2) Ford concedes she told no one what happened to her at the time, not even her best friend or mother. That means she can rely on no contemporaneous witness to corroborate her story.

3) Worse, the four other people she identified as attending the party, including Kavanaugh, all deny knowledge of the gathering in question, including Leland Ingham Keyser, who she calls a “lifelong friend.”

Keyser’s lawyer told the Senate Judiciary Committee: “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with or without Dr. Ford.”

The other two potential witnesses — Mark Judge and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth — also deny any recollection of attending such a party. The committee took their sworn statements “under penalty of perjury.” “These witnesses directly contradict Professor Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley advised Ford’s attorneys last week.

In her original letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Ford claimed that Kavanaugh talked to Keyser and Smyth right after he assaulted her. Yet neither shares her memory.

This is, to say the least, highly problematic for her case. No witness corroborates any part of her story.

4) Her own immediate family doesn’t appear to be backing her up, either. Her mother, father and two siblings are all conspicuously absent from a letter of support released by a dozen relatives, mostly on her husband’s side of the family.

The letter attests to her honesty and integrity. “Why didn’t her parents and brothers sign the letter?” a congressional source familiar with the investigation wondered.

5) This summer, Ford tried to reach out to old friends from high school and college to jog her memory. They couldn’t help her. “I’ve been trying to forget this all my life, and now I’m supposed to remember every little detail,” Ford complained to one friend in July, according to an account in The San Jose Mercury News.

6) Yet she still pushed forward with her bombshell charge, contacting The Washington Post tip line and Democratic lawmakers, while hiring a Democratic activist lawyer. Ford is also a Democrat, as well as an anti-Trump marcher, raising questions about the motive and timing of the allegations along with their veracity.

7) Ford contends that notes her therapist took in 2012 corroborate her account. But they don’t mention Kavanaugh.

They also point up inconsistencies in her story. For instance, her shrink noted that Ford told her there were “four boys” in the bedroom, not two as she now says. The notes also indicate Ford said she was in her “late teens” when she was assaulted. But Ford now says she may have been only 15.

8) In another inconsistency, Ford told The Washington Post she was upset when Trump won in 2016, because Kavanaugh was mentioned as a Supreme Court pick. But Kavanaugh wasn’t added to Trump’s list of possibles until November 2017, a full year later.

On top of all that, Kavanaugh “unequivocally denied Dr. Ford’s allegations . . . under penalty of perjury” during a Sept. 17 interview with committee lawyers, Grassley said, adding he was “forthright and emphatic in his testimony” and “fully answered all questions.”

The sworn interview will no doubt be used to test the consistency and veracity of his public statements Thursday.

Yet Democrats have already tried and convicted Kavanaugh of sexual assault. Without hard evidence, without substantiation, some even go beyond Ford’s claims to call him an out-and-out “rapist,” “sexual predator,” even a “child predator.”

As a result, Kavanaugh and his family, “including his two young daughters, have faced serious death threats and vicious assaults,” Grassley said. “And they’re getting worse each day.”

Ford, who also has received threats, is by all accounts a respected scientific researcher in the field of psychology with an impressive pedigree. While that makes her credible, the same can’t be said for her story. Unless she can fill in the many holes, Kavanaugh still deserves the presumption of innocence.

Paul Sperry is a bestselling author.

 

 

 

 

I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration

I have included the failing NYT’s unvetted piece by an unknown author attacking President Trump and by extension, the American people. The history of the failing NYT means that a NYT writer being the author is not outside the realm of possibilities. Just saying…

We all know the demonstrated history of the failing New York Times and it’s anti-Trump, anti-conservative, pro-leftist leadership position in the FAKE NEWS CABAL(FNC). The Cabal being MSM, FAKE NEWS, FBI, IRS, CIA , etc. aka the Swamp.

The Cabal believe that you and I are too stupid to know what is best for ourselves, our families and America.  This unvetted piece is another example of the anger and hatred that is FNC. An anger and hatred focused on President Trump and on the growing number of American people supporting President Trump and his agenda.

Of course, remember that USA TODAY and FL TODAY are stanch and long time members of the FNC. The Cabal’s forte and mission, is to lie by fact or omission, undermining the US Constitution and the American people’s will.

Think exactly what that means as you read this unvetted piece by an unknown author……. Continue reading

THE TRUTH ABOUT GUN FREE ZONES, FIREARMS, HISTORY AND DEMOCRATS, (LIBERALS/PROGRESSIVES)

INCREDIBLE..and well worth the look and listen! Hits the nail on the head in many areas.

I wish Nick Freitas were my Brevard County representative. Rep. Randy Fine  doesn’t represent the will of the people, but follows the dictates that will be politically expedient for him and his political career.. at any cost !

 

http://dailysignal.com/2018/03/07/7-points-virginia-lawmaker-made-speech-guns-went-viral/

THE TRUMP FACTOR AND HIS WONDERFUL LACK OF DECORUM

God morning Patriots,

A good friend of mine sent this article published in TownHall to me. The  author is Evan Sayet, and the article is entitled He Fights.

This is a spot on assessment of why President Trump was elected,and why each day, more Americans stand up for him. This goes to point whether you voted for him or not.

A great read. Concise and to the point.. Continue reading

GuideStar President and CEO Jacob Harold,Labels Conservative Groups “HATE GROUPS”

Patriots, 
It’s time to “vote with our feet”.
According to the Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal,  Jacob Harold is using the guidance of the Southern Poverty Law Center, a radical, ultra left organization, to smear and label Conservative groups, of which many are Christian, as “Hate Groups”.
I will no longer donate nor use the services of Guidestar.
View image on Twitter
 Pajama Boy, Jacob Harold with Code Pink at President Trump’s inauguration.

Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, one of the conservative groups tarred by GuideStar, speaks at the 2016 Republican National Convention in Cleveland last July. (Photo: Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/Newscom)

The nation’s leading source of information on U.S. charities faces mounting criticism for using a controversial “hate group” designation in listings for some well-known and broadly supported conservative nonprofits.

GuideStar, which calls itself a “neutral” aggregator of tax data on charities, recently incorporated “hate group” labels produced by the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center.

The decision by the tracker of nonprofits prompted 41 conservative leaders to protest the move in a letter provided exclusively to The Daily Signal. The letter, dated June 21, asks the website to drop the “hate group” labels put on 46 organizations. (Read the full letter below.)

GuideStar’s use of the “hate group” designation for certain organizations, many of them Christian, unfairly and inaccurately adopts the “aggressive political agenda” of Southern Poverty Law Center, the leaders write.

Americans need an alternative to the mainstream media. But this can’t be done alone. Find out more >>

Among the organizations represented are the Family Research Council, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, the Immigration Reform Law Institute, the American College of Pediatricians, the National Task Force for Therapy Equality, the American Family Association, the London Center for Policy Research, and the Jewish Institute for Global Awareness.

In the letter to GuideStar President and CEO Jacob Harold, the conservative leaders write:

We, the undersigned organizations and individuals, write to express our strong disagreement with GuideStar’s newly implemented policy that labels 46 American organizations as ‘hate groups.’ Your designations are based on determinations made by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a hard-left activist organization. As such, SPLC’s aggressive political agenda pervades the construction of its ‘hate group’ listings.

A biography of Harold on GuideStar’s website describes him as a “social change strategist.” He is seen in this tweet participating in the Jan. 21 Women’s March in Washington, D.C., which opposed new President Donald Trump:

Prior to joining GuideStar, Harold worked for the Hewlett Foundation’s philanthropy program, as a “climate change campaigner” for Rainforest Action Network and Greenpeace USA, and as an organizing director at Citizen Works.

Signers of the letter sound their concern that GuideStar, which calls itself a neutral public charity, is using the Southern Poverty Law Center’s much-contested language to flag “hate groups,” organizations that SPLC disagrees with.

“I think that what GuideStar is doing is another attack on conservative Christian organizations and individuals,” William G. “Jerry” Boykin, a retired Army general who is executive vice president of the Family Research Council, told The Daily Signal in an interview, adding:

We have seen the same thing from other places to include certain media outlets.  GuideStar says that they are neutral, but they are anything but neutral. In fact, they are, I would say at this point, they are becoming an arm of the ultra-left.

Mat Staver, who also signed the letter and is the founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, a legal group focused on religious liberty, told The Daily Signal in a phone interview he detects purposeful motivation behind GuideStar’s flagging.

“The intent there obviously is to harm, I think, these organizations,” Staver said.

Foundations, corporations, and other institutions look at listings by such organizations as GuideStar when they determine where to make tax-exempt contributions. They are unlikely to donate money to any organization labeled as a hate group, the conservative leaders argue.

A GuideStar spokesperson told The Daily Signal in an email Wednesday that the website will change some of the language:

GuideStar draws information from thousands of distinct sources, each of them imperfect. In aggregate, those sources help us offer a multidimensional view of nonprofits. However, we recognize that the SPLC data is especially controversial. We are changing the text description of this data and reconsidering where and how we present it on our website.

The changes will appear within a few days, the spokesperson said.

Family Research Council’s Boykin said GuideStar has two options.

“I think their choices are either take this label [down] that you have put on these different organizations, all of which are conservative Christian organizations, or acknowledge that you are a politically active arm of the liberal progressive movement in America,” he said.

Staver said his organization, one of those flagged by GuideStar as a hate group, asked Harold to promptly remove that label.

“So, 41 organizations are joining together, we are asking GuideStar’s CEO to respond to me within a very quick turnaround time to reverse its course and cease this false and defamatory labeling that it is using on its website,” Staver told The Daily Signal, referring to the letter.

Among the signers is Edwin J. Feulner, founder and president of The Heritage Foundation, the parent organization of The Daily Signal. Two other fixtures of the conservative think tank, Heritage board member Edwin Meese III and Heritage Action CEO Michael Needham, also signed the letter. Heritage is not labeled a hate group by either SPLC or GuideStar.

Organizations such as the Family Research Council are well aware of the implications of the messaging that GuideStar is perpetrating, Staver said.

Floyd Corkins, the man convicted of a 2012 attempt to massacre employees at the Family Research Council, was inspired by SPLC’s description of the Christian pro-family research organization as a hate group, he noted.

In an interview with the FBI, Corkins said a list on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s website motivated his attack. SPLC has acknowledged the connection.

The letter notes that James T. Hodgkinson, the man who police say tried to gun down Republican lawmakers last week, liked the Southern Poverty Law Center on Facebook.

House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., was gravely wounded in the gunman’s attack June 14 during practice for a congressional baseball game just outside Washington in Alexandria, Virginia.

“Does it not concern you that within the past five years, the SPLC has been linked to gunmen who carried out two terrorist shootings in the D.C. area?” the letter to Harold says, adding:

With these points in mind, we respectfully request that GuideStar return to its prior, nonpolitical approach to evaluating nonprofit organizations. Please send your reply within one week of receipt of this letter.

Read the full letter from 41 conservative leaders to GuideStar:

 

FOX News

Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost — Thomas Jefferson

The Rush Limbaugh Show

Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost — Thomas Jefferson

Politics – The Daily Caller

Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost — Thomas Jefferson

Washington Times

Updates Around the World

Drudge Retort

Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost — Thomas Jefferson

All Freedoms

Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost — Thomas Jefferson

The Atavist Magazine

Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost — Thomas Jefferson

The WordPress.com Blog

The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.

%d bloggers like this: