Gosnell…

My wife and I went to the movies today and saw the incredible movie GOSNELL. I strongly recommend it to all.

No matter what you have heard, read or seen, this movie isn’t about abortion. It is about local and state government failing. Failing on many levels, especially failing those that are the most vulnerable.  Continue reading

RACHEL MITCHELL’S REPORT ON THE FAKE FORD TESTIMONY..

The nation watched and learned, as a 100% fabricated event, orchestrated by the vile and amoral Democrats, unfolded to destroy Judge Kavanaugh, his family and his reputation. Rachel Mitchell, Nominations Investigative Counsel, questioned Mrs. Ford. The report is very telling, and should alert every American to the DemocRats, (aka Liberals/Progressives/Socialists) will go to any length to get and […]

Read more of this post

Comment    See all comments
Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from C Hamilton Boone’s “All Freedoms” Blog.
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.hamboone.com/2018/10/01/rachel-mitchells-report-on-the-fake-ford-testimony/

WHO IS FAKE FORD..THE FACTS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE..

As with most people who follow politics, I am watching the purposeful destruction of an honorable man’s reputation and career..to say nothing of what this circus is dong to his family.

Just think of that..the single focused effort by evil and corrupt people to manufacture an event and destroy a citizen..all because they want to win! Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?

We have seen this playbook time and again with the DemoRats, it’s destroy at all costs; damn the facts!

Using innuendo, misrepresentation..aka LIES, they show no conscience..but do show their soulless and immoral actions in the full view of all. More each day are learning who and what the DemocRats(Socialist) exactly are, and the level they are willing to stoop.

This article in the Washington Times, lays bare 8 reasons Fake Ford and the DemocRat’s story smells..

Eight big problems for Christine Blasey Ford’s story

Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations against Brett Kavanaugh are serious. She is accusing him of violent attempted rape. “I thought he might inadvertently kill me. He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing,” she told The Washington Post, recounting the alleged incident at a high school party “one summer in the early 1980s.”

But her story is also growing less believable by the day. Here are eight reasons why it’s hardly “anti-woman” for senators to question her account at Thursday’s hearing:

1) For starters, Ford still can’t recall basic details of what she says was the most traumatic event in her life. Not where the “assault” took place — she’s not sure whose house it was, or even what street it was on. Nor when — she’s not even sure of the year, let alone the day and month.

Ford’s not certain how old she was or what grade she was in when she says an older student violently molested her. (But she doesn’t plead inebriation: She described having just “one beer” at the party.)

2) Ford concedes she told no one what happened to her at the time, not even her best friend or mother. That means she can rely on no contemporaneous witness to corroborate her story.

3) Worse, the four other people she identified as attending the party, including Kavanaugh, all deny knowledge of the gathering in question, including Leland Ingham Keyser, who she calls a “lifelong friend.”

Keyser’s lawyer told the Senate Judiciary Committee: “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with or without Dr. Ford.”

The other two potential witnesses — Mark Judge and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth — also deny any recollection of attending such a party. The committee took their sworn statements “under penalty of perjury.” “These witnesses directly contradict Professor Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley advised Ford’s attorneys last week.

In her original letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Ford claimed that Kavanaugh talked to Keyser and Smyth right after he assaulted her. Yet neither shares her memory.

This is, to say the least, highly problematic for her case. No witness corroborates any part of her story.

4) Her own immediate family doesn’t appear to be backing her up, either. Her mother, father and two siblings are all conspicuously absent from a letter of support released by a dozen relatives, mostly on her husband’s side of the family.

The letter attests to her honesty and integrity. “Why didn’t her parents and brothers sign the letter?” a congressional source familiar with the investigation wondered.

5) This summer, Ford tried to reach out to old friends from high school and college to jog her memory. They couldn’t help her. “I’ve been trying to forget this all my life, and now I’m supposed to remember every little detail,” Ford complained to one friend in July, according to an account in The San Jose Mercury News.

6) Yet she still pushed forward with her bombshell charge, contacting The Washington Post tip line and Democratic lawmakers, while hiring a Democratic activist lawyer. Ford is also a Democrat, as well as an anti-Trump marcher, raising questions about the motive and timing of the allegations along with their veracity.

7) Ford contends that notes her therapist took in 2012 corroborate her account. But they don’t mention Kavanaugh.

They also point up inconsistencies in her story. For instance, her shrink noted that Ford told her there were “four boys” in the bedroom, not two as she now says. The notes also indicate Ford said she was in her “late teens” when she was assaulted. But Ford now says she may have been only 15.

8) In another inconsistency, Ford told The Washington Post she was upset when Trump won in 2016, because Kavanaugh was mentioned as a Supreme Court pick. But Kavanaugh wasn’t added to Trump’s list of possibles until November 2017, a full year later.

On top of all that, Kavanaugh “unequivocally denied Dr. Ford’s allegations . . . under penalty of perjury” during a Sept. 17 interview with committee lawyers, Grassley said, adding he was “forthright and emphatic in his testimony” and “fully answered all questions.”

The sworn interview will no doubt be used to test the consistency and veracity of his public statements Thursday.

Yet Democrats have already tried and convicted Kavanaugh of sexual assault. Without hard evidence, without substantiation, some even go beyond Ford’s claims to call him an out-and-out “rapist,” “sexual predator,” even a “child predator.”

As a result, Kavanaugh and his family, “including his two young daughters, have faced serious death threats and vicious assaults,” Grassley said. “And they’re getting worse each day.”

Ford, who also has received threats, is by all accounts a respected scientific researcher in the field of psychology with an impressive pedigree. While that makes her credible, the same can’t be said for her story. Unless she can fill in the many holes, Kavanaugh still deserves the presumption of innocence.

Paul Sperry is a bestselling author.

 

 

 

 

THE FAKE FIGHT FOR A PINK VAGINA HAT WEARING TRUMP RESISTER

Patriots,

Below is the site where you can see and read Christine Ford’s High School yearbooks. She is Kavanaugh’s accuser and it sheds more light on another “witch hunt” against a good man.

Very telling..

 

https://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-christine-blasey-fords-high-school_19.html?showComment=1537409523569&m=1

Bruce Ohr’s efforts to secretly reshape the Trump probe started earlier in summer ’16

As each day dawns, we learn more of the 2 different systems of justice. One for fellow Americans and one for the Elite, aka the Swamp.

Through Bruce Ohr’s testimony, we understand more clearly the degradation and corruption that now defines the FBI, Dept of State, CIA, Main Stream Media and the Swamp cabal of Washington, D.C. and beyond. Continue reading

POTUS & Political Warfare; What is Being Done to President Trump and the American People

Rick Higgins was a senior DOD analyst trained in political warfare by “old school” DOD agents that are 70 & 80 years old today. The old agents went through the cold war, aka Political Warfare against Russia and won. They passed those sikills on to Mr Higgins. With this skill set, Mr Higgins recognized what was occurring against President Trump inside and outside the White House.

Mr Higgins wrote a memo after being removed by H.R. Mc Master. In February 2017, McMaster succeeded Michael Flynn as National Security Advisor. Shortly thereafter, McMaster was replaced by John Bolton. BTW, Mr. Higgins actually signed his name to his memo and spoke openly. This is very eye opening.. Continue reading

NEW YORK TIMES’ HISTORY OF LYING ABOUT “SENIOR OFFICALS”

The NYT is the Fake News leader of POLITICAL WARFARE against the American people and President Trump . I need to say that this type of Political Warfare is found locally in Florida Today/US Today.

Relax, President Trump: New York Times Has History of Exaggerating Seniority of Anonymous Officials

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.
Relax, President Trump: New York Times Has History of Exaggerating Seniority of Anonymous Officials
President Trump should probably call off the hunt for the “senior official in the…administration” who the New York Times is claiming wrote a damning op-ed for the newspaper.Apparently the “senior official” claims to be part of a group of White House staff trying to thwart the president’s agenda from within. He also claims they seriously considered trying to depose the president using the 25th amendment of the Constitution.Serious stuff. But President Trump should relax and remember it is the New York Times after all. The paper has a scandalous history of lying about the seniority of officials it quotes anonymously – especially when that source parrots their agenda.

A few years back they were caught red-handed deceiving their readers in such a way.

In a lengthy anti-fracking article they claimed that senior industry experts and insiders believed the industry to be little more than a “Ponzi scheme” … “set up for failure”.

They even had the emails from a series of senior insiders where these doubts were expressed.

According to the New York Times, one “energy analyst” wrote, “Am I just totally crazy, or does it seem like everyone and their mothers are endorsing shale gas without getting a really good understanding of the economics at the business level?”

Another “federal analyst” said in an industry email, “It seems that science is pointing in one direction and industry PR is pointing in another.”

Well unfortunately for the New York Times, the emails were from the Energy Information Agency – a government organization – so this meant Senate investigators were able to find the original emails and work out the identity of all these different senior experts.  It turns out the federal analyst, the energy analyst and the officer turned out to be the same person who was actually an intern when he wrote the first email and in an entry level position when he wrote the other comments. Yes, that’s right, the “Paper of Record” misrepresented an intern/junior employee as a senior official to push an agenda.

Was the New York Times embarrassed when their deception was uncovered? The Senate investigation did attract the attention of the New York Times Public Editor Arthur S Brisbane. “Can an intern be an “official”? It doesn’t sound right to me,”  he stated.

Well it sounded fine to the New York Times editorial board. They stood by their mislabelling of the intern/low level employees as a senior official. They later decided they didn’t want their stories to be second guessed in their own newspaper so they ended the role of public editor in the newspaper. And the reporter who misrepresented the intern, well, he was promoted. Ian Urbina is now a New York Times “investigative reporter based in Washington.” Maybe part of that investigation involved finding someone to write anti-Trump anonymous op/eds posing as a  “senior official in the Trump administration.” President Trump is probably wondering who the anonymous official is. Perhaps given the New York Times’s history of dissembling in this regard he should take his eyes off the cabinet table and wander down to whatever part of the White House holds the interns.

Phelim McAleer is a journalist and film maker. He  produced the movie Gosnell – The Trial of America’s Most Prolific Serial Killer which opens nationwide on October 12th. www.GosnellMovie.com